Forum and third-party reports · File modern-aminos · Checked
Modern Aminos on Reddit and forums: what is reported
modernaminos.com · Reddit presence recorded as "some" · 8 attributed reports · status at check: Operating
How to read this page
What a forum report is to this desk
This page collects what third parties say about Modern Aminos, as the file records it. A line enters the file when the desk reads it on a named source during the check: an independent testing service, a vendor wiki, a review aggregator, a Trustpilot page, or a forum summary. It is copied with its attribution and its date where the line carries one, and it is not adopted as a finding. The eight checks in the ledger beside this page are stamped from documents the desk could open for itself; none of the 8 lines below changed a stamp.
The record notes Reddit presence for Modern Aminos as "some", which is the desk's reading of whether the name comes up in the usual forums at all, not a count of threads or a sentiment. None of the lines below quotes a Reddit thread directly; the forum view reached the file through the sources named. At the desk's own search check on 2026-10-19 no reddit.com thread ranked for the question in the title, which is why the material is reproduced here from the record rather than linked.
Where a line makes a claim the ledger can speak to, the last column says what the file holds. Where a line reports a test result, the answer is always the same: the desk ran no test, and it records only how many certificates it could open from the storefront (1) and whether the storefront states that an outside laboratory tests its products. A report that a product failed a third party's test is that third party speaking about one sample on one date.
The reports
Attributed lines from the file
Source, as the line gives it
Date in the line
What is reported
What the file holds
Finnrick
Undated in the line
US Trustpilot profile removed for guideline violations (search snippets had shown about 1,563 reviews / 4.9 before removal); modernaminos.eu Trustpilot page carries negative reviews per Finnrick
The file records no readable Trustpilot profile for the storefront at the check.
Finnrick
Jun 13, 2026
Finnrick report (Jun 13, 2026): Wyoming LLC at a mass registered-agent address (30 N Gould St, Sheridan), operator trail points to Idaho, no public beneficial owners
The "identifiable company" check on the file is stamped Partial from the storefront's own pages.
Finnrick
Mar 2026
Finnrick: one retatrutide identity failure (Jul 9, 2025) and a Mar 2026 sample 21.7% below the vendor's batch claim
The desk ran no test. The file records 1 certificate opened from the storefront and stamps "third-party testing" Not verified.
Ordering terms carry five per cent of the weighted record; the file quotes the storefront's own wording where it could be read.
Finnrick
Undated in the line
Finnrick: 17 promoter placements, 14 with codes/links and no clear disclosure; r/ModernAminosGuide used a referral code
Outside the eight checks. Recorded here as reported; the desk prints no reviews and takes no placements.
Finnrick
Undated in the line
Finnrick: MODERN AMINOS trademark owned by an unrelated company (Modern Sports Nutrition LLC)
The "identifiable company" check on the file is stamped Partial from the storefront's own pages.
Finnrick
Undated in the line
Finnrick: COA labs cited by vendor (Vanguard, Chromate, TrustPointe, Freedom Diagnostics) have uneven accreditation and unresolved COA-falsification allegations
The "currently operating" check is stamped Verified at the check.
Finnrick
Jul 2026
Finnrick: 5 of 6 classifiable retatrutide tests passed (Jun 2025-Jul 2026), rating 79%, rank #119 of 482
The desk ran no test. The file records 1 certificate opened from the storefront and stamps "third-party testing" Not verified.
8 lines; 3 carry a date inside the line. "Third parties report" applies to every row. Sources: Finnrick.
The file records Reddit presence as "some" and holds 8 attributed reports, from Finnrick. None of the lines quotes a Reddit thread directly; what the file holds reached it through the sources named. At the desk's search check on 2026-10-19 no reddit.com thread ranked for the question, so what circulates is reproduced here from the record rather than linked.
Is Modern Aminos a scam?
The desk does not use the word. What the record holds against the file is a Trustpilot profile recorded as removed. The ledger verifies 2 of 8 checks and the seal reads F. Each fact is dated and linked from the full file.
Where is the full file?
At /verified/modern-aminos/: the eight stamped checks with the evidence line beside each, the certificates the desk opened, the catalog read, the dated timeline and the source record listing every page read. This page holds only what third parties report, set against that ledger.
Lines were read on or before from the sources named in the file's source record. The desk prints no customer reviews and attaches no rating markup; a line here is a quotation of a third party, not a review. What a removed Trustpilot profile does and does not mean is set out in Trustpilot profile removed: what it means. Modern Aminos sells, or sold, material labeled for laboratory research use only.
