Type the name into a search engine and the first page still offers Science.bio coupon codes, affiliate rankings and “best vendor” lists. Click through to science.bio itself and there is exactly one page: a notice that the company has decided to permanently close and discontinue the sale of research products, followed by a warning that any successor or reseller claiming to be Science.bio is fraudulent. There is no date, no reason and no forwarding address. We are publishing this report because the gap between what the web says about Science.bio and what Science.bio says about itself is now wide enough to cost a reader money.
What the closure notice says, and what it leaves out
The notice is unusually direct for this market. Most suppliers that stop trading simply let the domain lapse, so a company that goes to the trouble of posting a warning against imitators is telling buyers something useful. We take the statement at face value: the business is finished, and anyone selling under the name is not the business. What the notice does not do is explain itself. It gives no closure date, names no operator and offers no route for anyone with an open order.
Finnrick, an independent testing aggregator, fills in some of that silence. Its vendor report dated June 13, 2026 places the final shutdown in January 2026, which means the coupon pages still circulating are at least nine months out of date. The same report cites California correspondence addresses and an import footprint in North Las Vegas, with no headquarters ever stated. Finnrick also reports that buyers in the final month of trading complained of Zelle and crypto payments that were never reconciled, cancelled orders and support that did not answer. We attribute all of that to Finnrick; we could not observe it ourselves.
What the independent record shows
Set against the glowing affiliate copy, the test record is the most important thing a reader should know. Finnrick reports 5 passes across 12 tests, a 42 percent rate, with BPC-157 failing all 4 of its tests and PT-141 failing both of its tests. The four product names in our record, GHK-Cu, BPC-157, PT-141 and Melanotan II, are the items Finnrick sampled rather than a catalog the company published. Finnrick further reports that a sister brand, Botany.bio, sold an Alpha-GPC product that reportedly contained PEA. None of this is our finding, but all of it was public while the recommendation pages were live.
Everything else about the company is unverifiable. The catalog, testing program, labs, certificates, prices, shipping terms and policies went with the storefront, and archive access was not available to us. No Trustpilot profile is recorded, and no FDA warning letter naming Science.bio was found as of October 19, 2026.
Our read
Science.bio closed on its own terms and left a clear warning against imitators, which is more than most departed suppliers manage. The record it left behind is thin and, where it exists, unflattering: fewer than half of the independently tested samples passed, and the final weeks produced payment and support complaints. A reader holding an old Science.bio recommendation should treat it as expired, and a reader who finds a live store using the name should remember that the company itself has called that store a fraud.
